Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
唯有视死如归，让争议得以平息，以及你永远可以相信狗狗通人性。节奏稀巴烂，不妨碍老爷子帅帅帅！！！
从未喜欢过这个系列……续集在重复第一部的基本概念，却无视第一部恐怖惊悚风格，将原作幽闭恐惧的氛围换成了血腥杀戮场面。而反派父母的行为是种强设定，是编剧一厢情愿的将之与盲大爷联系在一起的强情节，不是真正推动故事的剧作方法。唯一喜欢的点是——坏人杀了英雄的狗，英雄放过坏人的狗，狗为英雄攻击了坏人，而狗最后也是安全的。
Salvation. 比前作强多了。Don't Breathe、Lights Out一直分不清，还有个It Follows，321星递减。主题架构类似卢克·埃文斯的《无人生还》。年近七旬的史蒂芬·朗真·廉颇。
刺激在蹂躏传统三观的故事。阿凡达里的郎上校真是越老越糟越俊美，全程古希腊雕塑呈现。
节奏，完成度都不错。但是2022了还在拍这种剧本，是不是过于敷衍和老套了？
剧情乏善可陈,不知道为什么韩国电影这么执着于尿裤子的废物小男孩的符号,看到感觉不下十次了
节奏，完成度都不错。但是2022了还在拍这种剧本，是不是过于敷衍和老套了？
上部紧张与屏息的压迫感荡然无存，杀戮也只为血腥存在，沦为一部极为普通的惊悚电影。
6.6分左右。
盲眼战斗设计的挺巧妙。和第一部的调子不太一样，但依旧算是完成了人物的转变。第二部变成了浪子回头的硬汉，还是海豹突击队。预测第三部就会顺着这个往下挖。挺理解的，毕竟family侠最初也就是个偷DVD的小贼，你看现在，一部一部做大做强。
郑雨盛ins特别推荐，挺过瘾的，小正太超可爱～虽然反派警察很扁平，没有人性到极点，来凸显几个灰色人物的人性之善，甚至愿意为救素不相识的孩子而牺牲，很感动了。
个人觉得还是蛮好看的，紧张刺激，一刻都不能放松，呼吸，一气呵成。没有煽情，点到即止。我忘了第一集的凶残手段到什么程度，但感觉在这部有所升华。
打斗片，错付了，等了boss有五十分😂好在质量还行，气氛突出，反转激烈。🐶子给满分
没有了道德约束，比第一部好看了，希望盲人老爷爷和叛徒小狗狗继续出系列
Don't Breathe 2似乎找不到确切的续集意义，仿佛剧本的缘由更像是来自于前作Stephen Lang的受欢迎，然而从恐怖到惊悚，反派到反英雄的过渡，单靠Stephen Lang和这强行续命的剧本是完全不够的。
第一部编剧接下了导演的活，瞎子老人洗白变主角，可惜故事并不是紧接第一部而是另起炉灶，第二部更像是前作或者番外篇，精彩镜头都放在预告骗里了，套路还是第一部的，所以基本没啥意思，不推荐
编剧真是莫名其妙，从前一部封闭环境下的猫鼠游戏到这里的粗暴追杀剧情，不仅没了惊悚的气氛，更将其完全转变成了一部无聊的血腥犯罪片。将第一部的侵略主次调换，却又是一个人单纯的屠杀，降智操作就不再多说了，我很讨厌这种用一堆恶人去洗白另一个恶人的剧情，真的别再来下一部
女儿从小就接受训练,老头偏执.卧室里藏匿这段惊悚气氛营造不错,将女儿的机智和勇敢展现无疑.老头由强势变为弱势,寡不敌众.剧情一波三折,挺狗血,但居然还解释的通.不应该算惊悚片了,完全没有1的那种闭气凝神的紧张感.如果一直在老房子,老头有地利,劫匪有天时人和,一直打到结束会不会更有看头(๑•̀ㅂ•́)و✧?结尾老头也算死得其所.总体还不错.8分吧
3.5星。你大爷还是你大爷。气氛还是蛮紧张的。狗狗好评，多加0.5星。期待3。
不及第一部给人的紧张感，最佳段落是水波感应，就有点普通。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
