Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
哈哈，好想好想振兴我的老家小镇，只是智慧不够，发现不了可以钻的漏洞～
理性让我们狭隘 爱让我们自由
皮克斯怎么也变得流水线了，不谈政治正确，故事本身很平庸，节奏前后撕裂很奇怪，居然还有让人无法理解的续集彩蛋。以后还能看到soul，coco，up这样的作品吗？（迪士尼真是害人不浅）
这才是派拉蒙最擅长的，结构工整情节精彩的「派式电影」，现实版「书中自有黄金屋」。有老白+安妮特贝宁这样的组合加持，演技方面自不必说。真实事件改编又使情节多了几分生活感从而显得更加活泼有趣。彩票牵出的不仅是聪颖的智慧，更体现出源自于夫妻、父子、家庭、邻里间的爱与真诚（这同样也是哈佛那个小家伙不具备的），结局合家欢。
在最先进的国家你永远永远永远不可能钻当权者的空子，除非你是当权者
很失望，难以相信是皮克斯的动画长片，生硬地套了玩具总动员的IP，故事又讲的过于平庸老套，皮克斯想做社会运动前，先把自己的本职工作做好吧
一场还富于民的童话，竟然是真人真事改编，一出可爱的美好生活记录，也许大部分人都只是想要简简单单的好好生活，发挥些许自我价值，只是大部分人又相互认为对方价值匮乏！每个人都有价值，哪怕看似废材，每个小镇都是有价值的，哪怕看起来萧瑟颓败，生活的盼头与愉快心情，才是人生的全部
没什么大意思。。。。正确的很，剧情基本上是毫无悬念的推进下去。
毒师从自己制毒挣大钱到带父老乡亲买彩票挣钱，哈。从退休失落症，到学会与人相处，到讨论什么重要，蛮温情的一部小片 7分
这不是一个简单的暴富电影，主人公用自己的智慧赢得彩金并与全镇分享，这就体现了他们的人格魅力，独乐乐不如众乐乐！
开头字幕“根据真实故事改编“以及后半句补充的“尽量啦”很可爱。
老白已经一而再再而三地告诉大家，学好数理化，走遍天下都不怕
世界真奇妙。本片改编自杰森·法冈在《赫芬顿邮报》发表的文章 ，讲述了一桩真实故事
数学好+胆子大+good heart=活该赚大钱！就是好羡慕，我也好想过这种天天数彩票的日子……
的漏洞套进一个社群主义壳，硬造出名校精英反派自私嘴脸衬托锈带工人的互帮互助情(is this a Hollywood film?），是杰书记下乡带领村民们实现共同富裕了
20220716看完，小镇居民，很可爱。生活中有比钱和赢更重要的东西值得守护。
皮克斯怎么也变得流水线了，不谈政治正确，故事本身很平庸，节奏前后撕裂很奇怪，居然还有让人无法理解的续集彩蛋。以后还能看到soul，coco，up这样的作品吗？（迪士尼真是害人不浅）
电影想表达的：退休职工发现自己的热情所在找到人生目标关注亲情blabla…
上班赚粉末钱，退休还要赚彩票钱，老白有点忙。很普通的剧情片。
谁能想到这竟然是真人真事改编的。退休老头偶然发现彩票漏洞后与妻子为大家谋福，而另一边，天才高中生却让彩票漏洞成全自己。看完后心中有个疑问:为何中国彩票漏洞还没人发现・_・?
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
