A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
我愿称之为《翻杀2之卡点来劲》，群众卡点倒戈为主角喊冤，后又卡点倒戈警察，根据需要反复横跳；卡点闹事，喊口号，卡点堵车子，卡点又倒戈主角。
该减的不减，不该加的乱加。原作故事很简单，基本全程靠华盛顿大叔的演技hold住，肖央也不差，但绝对比不了。还有这电视电影的画风是怎么回事？//尹子维怎么残成那样了
只想说市长靠关系拿到器官供体这种犯罪程度，比起贪污上亿要轻很多吧，更不用说为了几十万搞出一个豆腐渣工程害人姓名，当然最后也只是想洗白市长，但感觉比第一部差点意思
好久没进电影院了，包场的感觉真好。有原著打底，真是破船也有三根钉，有趣的部分全是藤子·F.不二雄的，改编部分实在毫无必要（你说你搞一个姐姐形象干啥，原作本来就有无性别的象征意味，隐喻最广泛的人被压迫），不如老老实实出个重制版。不过，幼时看只觉得有趣，现在看才发现左翼艺术家的笔法。这本质上还是一个走向gh与恢复dz角力的故事（这样得故事如今是越来越少见了），流亡总统和将军真是怎么看怎么眼熟。异星人依靠人类确立了天赐的权力，如今人类自己却身处两难的岔路口，看不到未来……
5、宋洋演技突破不小，可喜可贺；
又是泰国，这算不算是抹黑泰国？泰国人民要不干了啦。
文咏珊便秘式演技，乍一看以为贝勒爷进军演艺圈了。陈雨锶自拍式演技，像时时刻刻端着准备被街拍的女主播。李治廷出镜的时候，全场人都笑了。没逻辑的烂剧本、毫无新意的剧情麻烦平平淡淡地拍，背景镜头烘托太多真的很露拙……烂
还行吧。只不过市长到底是拍的好人还是坏人，怎么最后市长儿子还给墓碑也鞠了一躬。
另外，在泰国拍戏的香港演员努力说普通话真有点搞笑。
剧组是不是把我当傻逼，最后还要用萤火虫前后呼应，生怕我看不懂，气得出门马上要点根烟平静下
改编得不差。将原作的故事、情节统合到《误杀》“草根VS强权”的主题中，意象从羊变为萤火虫，算是工整。主角身份从影迷升级为编剧，这个故事也可以看作是，一个落魄编剧用自己的生命写下了人生最精彩的剧本，关于正义，关于公平，关于父子深情。
前后制作到上映没用到半年，整体就非常廉价，无聊的剧情，整个119分钟看下来我只看到制作者为了赚快钱的麻木，和对观众的极度敷衍，演技、剧情、拍摄什么的都不想展开吐槽了，槽多无口，倒土不洋。就一点，既然架空在泰国麻烦把车都换成右舵吧，稍微严谨一点就怎么难吗？欺负观众没去过泰国？尊重一下花钱的观众吧，毕竟票价定得真的不算低。
看之前没看原版，虽说bug很多，虽说故意煽情，但还算好看，能吸引我一直投入地看完。评分偏低。我给6.3，看完原版再回来改。
同样是年更为什么蜡笔小新剧场版的质量能经久不衰，本该更具创造力想象力的哆啦a梦剧场版却每年都在吃老本和质量下滑呢
创作者不易 但陈词滥调又强拉硬扯 IP的概念或许让人失去了原创的动力 写什么都像写同人文 毫无意义也无聊无趣
我这人泪点极低，全片就是一边在尴尬一边在难过，然后为自己的难过而尴尬
片名别叫误杀2 和误杀1没有半毛钱关系
除了最后悬疑结局设计得失败以外，其他都不错。本来值得更好的评价。
如果要靠杀人放火引起关注寻求帮助那么这个世界没救了吧
其实我本来对翻拍没什么偏见，但是一想到我们这种还不错的电影都不是原创剧本还是多多少少有点失望。不过总得来说还是对味了的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
