Ten years ago, Ginny (Toni Gonzaga), an Architecture student, and Marco (Piolo Pascual), a History professor, began a one-of-a-kind and unpredictable love story. In the five years that they were together, they brought out the best in each other, which included Marco's unrealized dream of becoming a chef. Together, they worked towards their dream of opening up a restaurant, but when Ginny realized her own pursuits were different from his, she rejected his wedding proposal and left the country for a Masters degree in Architecture. At present, Ginny co-owns a one-stop Architecture and Interior Design firm specializing in Restoration. She receives an email from Marco, which was written and sent after their break-up, meant to be read four years later. It makes her feel even more regretful of leaving the love of her life. When their firm receives an offer to restore an old house into a restaurant, she is ecstatic to learn that Marco will be co-owning the restaurant. She takes this as a sign...
其实拍得挺文艺的,但节奏太慢了。剪去30分钟毫不影响。剧本不太出色。
远去的淡影展现在画像师的笔下,迷离的案件也变的清晰了。
质感一流!!剧情略有BUG
得益于周楚楚的表演,严华的一些际遇和舞台顶替的一场戏略有光。
电影画面很唯美,能看得出导演的摄影功底很好,但悬疑部分不是很突出,有点混乱散碎,总的来说还是能够抓人眼球的。作为一部网大来说,这个完成度已经很令人惊喜了。
摄影挺好,故事单薄,节奏太拖,演技不够,画外音烦人中的烦人
作为悬疑片,故事的结构递进太薄弱了,每个伏笔在放置时就已经暴露,等待它何时被揭开只会觉得漫长。演员们的表演也还不足以撑起故事,于是浓密且轰隆的环境音和配乐席卷着精致的画面,促成了一股拼命去塑造氛围感的态势。片名的借用就不吐槽了。
画面很美 相比悬疑片 更像是文艺片 (剧情好拖沓 人物之间的关系刻画 以及 一些重要的情节都是一种铺垫式的处理, 个人不喜欢。
适合快进看,本身影片的时间也有点过长,节奏也有点拖沓。作为这个类型的电影,无论中间怎么反转,把悬念保持到最后是应该要做到的事。可观众最开始就能猜到结尾真相了。
氛围感节奏感都很棒,剧情其实也可以,可惜底牌太明.
值得收入教科书的艺术品。
本质上是一个带着浓浓悲伤的关于友情 梦想 人生的故事。
虽然不想剧透,但是真没见过一开头就能让人猜到的,照相馆一进去,画像一出来,不就知道谁是凶手了吗,然后到两个小时才告诉大家,欺负80年代没有dna检测吗?
虽然办案过程有点一般,但是两个女孩的友谊线还不错
220704:画面不错,没一个名演员能到这样很好了
怎么说呢...现在的影视剧越来越难以描述。挺好,好像又不太好。中规中矩吧,色调有点难受,没有新意。就还行,一般,挺好,不差。
剧情反转的还可以 虽然猜到了是这种反转 但处理的还挺好的
其实故事不是多悬疑和反转,但是片子主要想表现的也不是这些,从被主任侮辱之后就感觉她可能变了,远山是看不清的一如梦想,整片淡淡的忧伤
情节、节奏差到极点,完全对不起这种电影质感,另外很多镜头场景调度看得我太难受….最重要的是你以犯罪、悬疑为卖点,你这里面的逻辑硬伤和bug也太多了,总的来说电影太过粗糙了…
一直无法理解刚开始的目击证人是如何识别凶手照片的,识别后,画师又也怎么能联系上林音的。如果是林音,不就否定了自己的画?
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved